Last edited by Brashicage

6 edition of Averroës" middle commentaries on Aristotle"s Categories and De interpretatione found in the catalog.

Averroës" middle commentaries on Aristotle"s Categories and De interpretatione

by AverroГ«s

  • 361 Want to read
  • 4 Currently reading

Published by St. Augustine"s Press in South Bend, Ind .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Aristotle.,
  • Aristotle.,
  • Categories (Philosophy) -- Early works to 1800.,
  • Logic -- Early works to 1800.

  • Edition Notes

    Other titlesMiddle commentary on Aristotle"s Categories and De interpretatione
    StatementAverroës (Ibn-Rushd) ; translated, with notes and introductions by Charles E. Butterworth.
    ContributionsButterworth, Charles E.
    Classifications
    LC ClassificationsB749.A4 E5 1998
    The Physical Object
    Paginationxx, 193 p. ;
    Number of Pages193
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL690576M
    ISBN 101890318019
    LC Control Number97037675

    Ibn Rushd (c) Middle Commentaries on Aristotle, ed. C. Butterworth, Averroes' Middle Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories and De Interpretatione, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, (Translation and commentary on two of Ibn . Aristotle and the Arabic Tradition; Aristotle and the Arabic Tradition. Aristotle and the Arabic Tradition. Commentary on the Book of Causes [Super Librum de causis expositio], trans. Guagliardo, V. A., Hess, Al-Farabi’s Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle’s De interpretatione, trans. Zimmerman.

      Averroës (Ibn Rushd, ) emerged from an eminent family in Muslim Spain to become the first and last great Aristotelian of the classical Islamic world; his meticulous commentaries influenced Christian thinkers and earned him favorable mention (and a relatively pleasant fate) in Dante's Divina Commedia/5(77). State University of New York Press | Broadway | State University Plaza | Albany, NY Phone | Fax

    Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2d ed., () 1. Categories (Categoriae) A preliminary treatise dealing with (De interpretatione) A preliminary treatise dealing with propositions The theory of opposition, which book of the Topics. Keith Burgess-Jackson, 13 March   Averroës (Ibn Rushd, ) emerged from an eminent family in Muslim Spain to become the first and last great Aristotelian of the classical Islamic world; his meticulous commentaries influenced Christian thinkers and earned him favorable mention (and a relatively pleasant fate) in Dante's Divina Book of the Decisive Treatise was and remains one his most important works Brand: Brigham Young University.


Share this book
You might also like
Two little workes defensiue of our redemption

Two little workes defensiue of our redemption

Community groups in Haringey.

Community groups in Haringey.

Flambards divided

Flambards divided

Income tax relationships

Income tax relationships

American mathematical heritage

American mathematical heritage

Matthew Smith 1879-1959

Matthew Smith 1879-1959

Management of personnel in Indian enterprises

Management of personnel in Indian enterprises

Object-Oriented Databases

Object-Oriented Databases

Offshore Banking, Corruption, and the War on Terrorism

Offshore Banking, Corruption, and the War on Terrorism

Land transfer and finance

Land transfer and finance

Army Officer Candidate School

Army Officer Candidate School

Averroës" middle commentaries on Aristotle"s Categories and De interpretatione by AverroГ«s Download PDF EPUB FB2

Averroes' Middle Commentaries on Aristotles Categories and De Interpretatione 1st Edition by Averroes (Author), Charles Butterworth (Translator) ISBN ISBN Why is ISBN important.

ISBN. This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. Author: Averroes. Averroes' Middle Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories and De Interpretatione Book Description: Ibn Rushd (), better known as Averroes, is said to be the greatest among the Muslim commentators on Aristotle and is especially known for his influence on medieval Christendom and on medieval and Renaissance science and philosophy.

Commentaries on Aristotle refers to the great mass of literature produced, especially in the ancient and medieval world, to explain and clarify the works of pupils of Aristotle were the first to comment on his writings, a tradition which was continued by the Peripatetic school throughout the Hellenistic period and the Roman Neoplatonists of the late Roman empire wrote.

"The central theme of the De interpretatione is the nature of contradiction between assertions. This is a crucially important theme for dialectic, whose regular tasks include that of establishing the contradictory of a proposed thesis, and that of replying to a dilemmatic question by choosing between the affirmation and the negation of a given thesis.(4) The inquiry into language as such.

Averroës, the greatest Aristotelian of the Islamic philosophical tradition, composed some thirty-eight commentaries on the "First Teacher's" corpus, including three separate treatments of De Anima ("On the Soul"): the works commonly referred to as the Short, Middle, and Long Commentaries.

The Middle Commentary—actually Averroës's last writing on the text-remains one of his most refined and Author: Ibn Rushd. Books by Ibn Rushd. Averroes' Middle Commentaries on Aristotles Categories and De Interpretatione by.

Ibn Rushd, Averroes: Commentaire Moyen Sur Le de Interpretatione by. Ibn Rushd. it was amazing avg rating — 2 ratings — published Want to. Averroës, the greatest Aristotelian of the Islamic philosophical tradition, composed some thirty-eight commentaries on the "First Teacher’s" corpus, including three separate treatments of De Anima ("On the Soul"): the works commonly referred to as the Short, Middle, and Long Commentaries.

The Middle Commentary—actually Averroës’s last writing on the text-remains one of his most refined. De Interpretatione book. Read 18 reviews from the world's largest community for readers. De interpretatione from Aristoteles. Aristotle ( BCE) w /5().

Other articles where On Interpretation is discussed: Aristotle: Propositions and categories: The De interpretatione, like the Prior Analytics, deals mainly with general propositions beginning with Every, No, or Some.

But its main concern is not to link these propositions to each other in syllogisms but to explore the relations of compatibility and incompatibility between them. 74 See Charles, Généquand, Ibn Rushd's Metaphysics: A Translation, with Introduction, of Ibn Rushd's Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics, Book Lām (Leiden, ), pp.

54 ff. 75 See also Henri, Hugonnard-Roche, “Remarques sur l'évolution doctrinale d'Averroès dans les commentaires au De caelo: le problème du mouvement de la terre Cited by: 4. Commentaries on Aristotle. Between and Averroës wrote a series of commentaries on most of Aristotle’s works (e.g., The Organon, De anima, Physica, Metaphysica, De partibus animalium, Parva naturalia, Meteorologica, Rhetorica, Poetica, and the Nicomachean Ethics).

He wrote summaries, and middle and long commentaries—often two or. From inside the book. What people are saying - Write a review. Commentaries on Aristotle's De interpretatione, Volume 2 Commentaries on Aristotle's De interpretatione, Karl Meiser, ISBNVolume 2 of Commentaries on Aristotle's De interpretatione.

Ibn Rushd (c) Averroes' Middle Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories and De Interpretatione, trans. C.E. Butterworth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, (Contains the Talkhis kitab al-maqulat (Middle Commentary on the Categories) and Talkhis kitab al-'ibara (Middle Commentary on De interpretatione).

A detailed account of the. View Aristotle, De Interpretatione from PHIL at University of Maryland, College Park. CLARENDON ARISTOTLE SERIES ARISTOTLES POLITICS, Books III and IV Translated with Introduction and. The seminar is a parallel close reading of the Greek and Arabic texts of the De Interpretatione (Greek: Peri Hermeneias), the second text in the traditional arrangement of the Organon (excepting Porphyry's Eisagoge).

Here follow links to the basic texts, see further from the right menu. This translation of Averroes’ Long Commentary on Aristotle’s De Anima brings to English-language readers the complete text of this influential work of medieval philosophy.

Richard C. Taylor provides rich notes on the Long Commentary and a generous introduction that discusses Averroes’ most mature reflections on Aristotle’s teachings as Brand: Yale University Press. The Complete Works of otle lived from BCE. He was a Greek philosopher and is often referred to as the “first teacher” or the very “first true scientist.” His works cover a number of topics from politics, philosophy, metaphysics, logic, ethics, biology and more.

On Interpretation 3 Moreover, a verb is always a sign of something said of so-mething else, i.e. of something either predicable of or present in some other thing. Such expressions as ’is not-healthy’, ’is not, ill’, I do not de-scribe as verbs; for though they carry the additional note of time,File Size: 66KB.

Diagram: Professor Hood of SF state who has written a book on A’s category of relation, defends the following useful diagram of the distinctions in Chapter 2 of the Categories. She points out that Aristotle is here talking about predicates as well as things, and suggests the following relation of the 4 items discussed in Chapter 2.

commentaries De caelo(, Physics, De anima, Metaphysics), of two iddle m commentaries (De generatione and Meteorology, book IV) and of one epitome (Parva naturalia).8 But other scholars have pointed out that there is only one Averroes translation which is explicitly attributed to Michael Scot: the Long Commentary on De caelo.

This translation of Averroes' Long Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima brings to English-language readers the complete text of this influential work of medieval philosophy. Richard C. Taylor provides rich notes on the Long Commentary and a generous introduction that discusses Averroes' most mature reflections on Aristotle's teachings as well as /5(16).[=middle commentaries on Categories, De interp, Prior analytics, Posterior analytics, Topics, Sophistical Refutations].

Averroes, Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories and De Size: KB.2 Introduction Averroes discusses the metaphysics of human epistemology extensively.1 Several of his works, most prominently his three commentaries on Aristotle’s De Anima, attempt to explain how finite, particular minds interact with universal, eternal intelligibles.2 These three commentaries are named (according their lengths): the Short Commentary, the MiddleAuthor: Caleb H A Brown.